Proyecto MACS logo
|   Project aims  |   The MACS team  |   Projects  |   Publications  |   News  |   Outreach  |   Homepage  |  

                                                                                                                       

The interactions between environmental, agro-ecological and socio-political factors in determining vicuña distribution and appropriate management systems

The research evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of sustainable wildlife use as a tool for involving community participation in wildlife conservation. The case of the vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) is used to identify how attitudes (and actions) of rural communities and government initiatives for conservation and rural development interact to influence the population and distribution of the species.

 The main objectives of the work are: 

  1. to establish how patterns of vicuña distribution evolved following the introduction of protection measures in the 1970s and 1980s.
  2. to evaluate the commercial and non-commercial benefits and costs of vicuña management by rural communities, and the expectations that communities have of this activity.
  3. to assess the extent to which involvement in vicuña fibre harvesting results in communities changing land management practices to encourage more vicuña?

Current developments in policy towards managing the vicuña make this an excellent example with which to study the interactions between opportunities for commercial exploitation, resource management by campesinos and the ecology of the vicuña.

 It is important that the evaluation of human impacts on vicuña distribution and population density is based on a sound ecological footing. Likewise, projections of future growth potential for wild vicunas and potential future harvests require a detailed understanding of the natural and anthropogenic factors regulating population growth.

 Literature related to those objectives

At the end of the 1960s the vicuña was in serious threat of extinction, having experienced a population crash after many years of overhunting.  The high rate of recovery following the introduction of protection measures, in particular the regulation of international trade, suggests that overexploitation, as opposed to other potential processes (competition with livestock, habitat modification, disease), that was the most important population regulating factor acting on populations throughout the vicuña’s range.

 Through the establishment of 2 international agreements to protect the vicuña – the Vicuña Convention, an agreement between the governments of Peru Bolivia, Argentina, Chile, and later Equador, and CITES (Convention on Trade in Endangered Species of Flora and Fauna) – established a strong state-level commitment to vicuña conservation. This commitment manifested itself in the establishment of protected areas, and also in the recording of vicuña numbers and distribution, and in sponsorship of research.

The censuses of vicunas were undertaken to monitor the success of the conservation effort, and latterly to evaluate the value of wild stocks of vicuña as a resource for exploitation by local communities. This data is mostly unpublished, grey literature, but it is extensive, involving the evaluation of vicuña numbers over some 150,000 km² of altiplano in successive years by direct observation.

 The intensity of sampling has not been uniform, and there are a small number of sites where data quality is regular enough to undertake a detailed study of the population ecology of the species. Datasets are available in Pampa Galeras, in the Peruvian department of Ayacucho,  Parinacota in the Chilean I region (Tarapaca), Ulla Ulla to the north of Lago Titicaca in Bolivia, and Mauri Desaguadero to the south of Lago Titicaca.  These datasets are sufficient to allow a comparative study of the spatial and population dynamics of the vicuña to be made, including the relation between abundance and the distribution of vegetation types.

 Plan of Action

 The data that will be used to make this assessment of vicuña ecology and use is derived from three primary sources:

 Direct observations: The results of censuses undertaken during the period 1965 to present throughout the altiplano. These have been undertaken primarily by government agencies. Most censuses are published in summary form, and are contained within documents presented to the Vicuña Convention. Details of the censuses are maintained by the specific departments involved, and are generally available for use for research purposes by formal agreement with those departments. Livestock population and distribution data is available from the relevant agricultural ministries and statistical offices.

Remote sensing: Resources such as The Global Land Cover Facility provide detailed 5m resolution imagery of the study area that can be used to develop Land Cover and NDVI maps of the study areas. This will be used for assessing habitat quality and the extent of bofedal cover in study areas.

Stakeholder Interviews: Socio-economic data will be assessed by semi-structured interviews with campesinos in and around areas where vicuña management is now practiced. The objective of such interviews is to assess any discrepancies between expected and realised benefits from vicuña management, and to evaluate the extent to which vicuña are regarded ad integral or antagonistic to primary activities of those campesinos.

Further information

Literature review (PDF)

Presentation


This research is supervised by Dr David Preston, Dr Steve Carver, and Dr Oliver Phillips at the School of Geography, University of Leeds, and by Prof Iain Gordon at the Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen.

The project began in November 2002, and will finish in October 2005.


This site is maintained by Jerry Laker for Proyecto MACS
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute
Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH. UK
j.laker@macaulay.ac.uk