Latest reports from each
work package (Jan 2004)
Work
Package 1: Utilisation systems
We have been undertaking a
detailed study of the impact of management systems on both individual animal
welfare and population ecology. Taken together, this information enables us to
compare the performance of different management approaches, and establish
quality standards. The assessment of welfare in wild animals is a new science,
and we have sought to adapt approaches recently developed for studying welfare
of deer and domestic species in extensive farms. An extensive programme of
fieldwork was carried forward through 2003 as a collaboration between the
Catholic University in Santiago (PUC) and Oxford University (WildCRU). This work
has led to the development of a comprehensive ethogram for captive and wild
guanacos, and with this, the evaluation of the behavioural impacts of different
handling procedures during management activities, including anaesthetic darting
and restraint in a handling crush. The techniques were applied in the field to
the evaluation of capture systems for vicuña in Argentina during trial captures
carried out during May and November 2003.
Work Package 2: Policy, economics and
socio-cultural impacts.
International policy for vicuña conservation and sustainable use is continually
advancing. During the 2002 Convention on Trade in Endangered Species (CITES),
held in Santiago, Chile, there was considerable debate on the future of trade
regulations for vicuña products. This debate centred on three main issues – the
effects of different production systems on conservation, the economics of
different production systems, and the importance of local community involvement
in vicuña exploitation and conservation. The MACS partnership was widely
involved in providing supporting information to the conference, and is expected
to continue this involvement at the next round of talks in Thailand in 2004.
At a national level, we have been collecting data on management systems employed
throughout the altiplano and developed an integrated approach to analysing the
economic, social and political aspects of each. This work is demonstrating
clearly how socio-political context has influenced the regional diversity of
production systems observed and highlighted the continuing need for information
on the ecological/ animal welfare context of sustainable use. At a regional
level, we have been supplying supporting information to the development of an
action plan for vicuña management in Chile, to the regional authorities of fauna
management in Argentina, and have been developing improvements to the
legislation on vicuña management in Peru.
Work Package 3: Environmental Impacts
Introducing novel management systems for a keystone species is likely to have
unexpected consequences, particularly when the management proposed (non-lethal
harvesting of wildlife products followed by re-release) is unique in the world.
We are looking at three important aspects of this: the possible disruption of
“normal” patterns of herd structure and territoriality by capture events; the
possibility of long-term impacts of capture and shearing on mortality and
morbidity; and the dynamics of resource use and competition between vicuña and
domestic livestock (llama, alpaca, sheep).
We undertook two captures of vicuña in Cieneguillas, Argentina during 2003. The
first, without shearing, established baseline information on physiological and
behavioural variables, and marked animals for future monitoring. The second
involved the harvest of 17 kg of fibre from 70 vicuña. The whole process was
intensively monitored, and demonstrated effective measures to minimise stress
and mortality. We have completeted the fieldwork phase of a study in Catamarca
of the ecology of a protected area where management of vicuña is planned (by the
Argentine authorities) following downgrading in 2002 of that population from
CITES Appendix I to Appendix II.
Work Package 4: Biodiversity Conservation
The vicuña population throughout the altiplano exhibits important variations.
Two phenotypic variants are recognised as sub-species - Vicugna vicugna
mensalis and Vicugna vicugna vicugna – but recently, using a
microsatellite DNA technique, it has been possible to distinguish genotypic
variants that appear to reflect a history of reproductive isolation of distinct
populations. This level of regional heterogeneity is vitally important to the
conservation effort, representing an early stage in possible divergant evolution
of isolated populations, and at least, it demonstrates the reservoir of genetic
diversity that is an important factor in ensuring the species’ long-term
resistance to a range of possible threats.
We are conducting a far-reaching survey of vicuña and guanaco genetics to
produce distribution maps of regional variation, and guide policy on the
translocation of individuals in restocking programmes.
Work Package 5: Networking and dissemination
Considerable attention is paid in the MACS project to cooperation with
researchers outwith the project partnership, and to dissemination of
information. Dissemination is aimed at policy makers, teachers, local
communities, and the scientific community. To this end, the team has produced a
wide range of material – a bulletin, brochure, a guide to management for
communities, teaching aids, courses to teachers, information to government and
NGOs. In addition, we have communicated the general aims and ideas of the
project to a wider audience through the popular media.
Conclusions
The MACS project
has established a programme to test the impact of management systems on both
vicuña and guanaco, and these activities are generating a unique data resource
on the impacts of wild animal management. This combination of practical
experience, samples and data is giving the team new insights into the complex
interrelation of factors involved in the development of effective sustainable
use systems, as well as the dangers of inappropriate management, which are
providing experience, and physiological samples. The team is working well
together on a project that is well-adjusted to the percieved need for research
of the wider community with a stake in camelid management, including government
agencies and NGOs. Significant progress has been made with establishing all the
key lines of research, the methodologies for collaborative activities, and a
workable schedule for future investigation and dissemination |
|
|