GRANADA WORKSHOP REPORT 9.
CIATA, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
Summary
Currently, there are many fashionable words, such as extensification,
sustainability, biodiversity etc., used too frequently with little consideration
of the actual situation. The degree of development in rural areas can vary
greatly between areas, even over short distances. Such differences can
obviously be even greater between regions or countries. Much of the variation
can be attributed to the effects of different agricultural and rural policies.
While in some countries, the process of intensification was begun in
the sixties and before, in others, especially those which joined the European
Union late, the recent phase of agricultural intensification only began
in the 1980s, and has also mainly been confined to the lowlands. Only limited
intensification has taken place in upland and less-favoured areas. Extensification,
therefore, may indeed be an appropriate alternative to improve economic
and environmental sustainability in the developed, lowland situation. However,
in areas which are already "less-favoured", including many common
lands, with low-grade vegetation resources, calls to extensify production
mean little more than "Please maintain your poor conditions and living
standards". Even in fertile lowlands, extensification requires an
adequate land base to maintain profitability, and this not always available.
Sustainability is in this context a more useful concept.
But how might it be possible to achieve sustainability in these less-favoured
areas ? At least 5 conditions must be met:
The availability of land and vegetation are the main factors limiting the
number of animals and herd size. When large areas are available, extensive
systems producing low-nutrient requiring products, such as wool and other
fibres, may be appropriate, but where land availability is restricted,
intensification is essential to achieve economic sustainability. Thus the
level of intensification required to achieve economic sustainability is
inversely related to the quantity x quality of available land and vegetation.
Figure 1. Undesirable evolution of land use
Land type | Grazing system | Development process | Sustainability | Ecosystem effect |
Less-favoured | Extensive | Extensification | Unsustainable | Desertification |
> |
> |
> |
||
Favoured | Intensive | Intensification | Sustainable | Pollution |
Figure 2 Sustainable evolution of land use
Land type | Grazing system | Development process * | Sustainability | Ecosystem effect |
Less-favoured | Extensive | Intensification | Sustainable | Biodiversity |
> |
> |
> |
||
Favoured | Intensive | Extensification | Sustainable | Biodiversity |
* This stage will be dependent on the availability of
land
Table 1. Main limits to sustainability.
quality low
lowlands: quantity low
quality high