The European Conference on Rural Development, "Rural Europe - Future Perspectives"
Having met at Cork, Ireland from 7th to 9th November, 1996
Aware | that rural areas - which are the home of a quarter
of the population and account for more than 80% of the territory of the
European Union - am characterised by a unique cultural. economic and social
fabric, an extraordinary patchwork of activities, and a great variety of
landscapes (forests and farmland, unspoiled natural sites, villages and
small towns, regional centres, small industries); |
Believing | that rural areas and their inhabitants are a real asset to the European Union, and have the capacity to be competitive; |
Mindful | that by far the largest part of rural Europe is covered b
agricultural land and forests, which have a strong influence on the character
of European landscapes, and that agriculture is and must remain a major
interface between people and the environment, and that farmers have a duty
as stewards of many of the natural resources of the countryside; |
Recalling | that agriculture and forestry are no longer predominant in Europe's economics; that their relative economic weight continues to decline, and that, consequently, rural development must address all socioeconomic sectors in the countryside |
Conscious | that European citizens pay growing attention to the quality of life in general, and to questions of quality; health; safety; personal development; and leisure, in particular, and that rural areas are in a unique position to respond to these interests, and offer grounds for a genuine, modem development model of quality; |
Recognizing | that the Common Agricultural Policy will have to adapt to new realities and challenges in terms of consumer demand and preferences, international trade developments, and the EU's next enlargement; that the shift from price support to direct support will continue; that the CAP and the agricultural sector will have to adjust accordingly, and that farmers must be helped in the adjustment process, and be given clear indicators for the future; |
Expecting | that the justification for the compensatory payments of the 1992 CAP reforms will be increasingly challenged; |
Persuaded | that the concept of public financial support for rural development, harmonised with the appropriate management of natural resources and the maintenance and enhancement of biodiversity and cultural landscapes, is increasingly gaining acceptance; |
Recognising | that, while successive reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy and European rural development policies have improved transparency and effectiveness, a number of inconsistencies and overlaps have developed and legal complexity has grown; |
Determined | to promote, in all possible ways, local capacity building for sustainable development in rural areas, and, in particular, private and community-based initiatives which are well-integrated into global markets; |
Announces | the following ten point rural development programme for the European Union. |
Sustainable rural development must be put at the top of the agenda of
the European Union, and become the fundamental principle which underpins
all rural policy in the immediate future and after enlargement. This aims
at reversing rural out-migration, combating poverty, stimulating employment
and equality of opportunity, and responding to growing requests for more
quality, health, safety, personal development and leisure, and improving
rural well-being. The need to preserve and improve the quality of the rural
environment must be integrated into all Community policies that relate
to rural development. There must be a fairer balance of public spending,
infrastructure investments and educational, health and communications services
between rural and urban areas. A growing share of available resources should
be used for promoting rural development and securing environmental objectives.
Rural development policy must be multi-disciplinary in concept, and
multi-sectoral in application, with a clear territorial dimension. It must
apply to all rural areas in the Union, respecting the concentration principle
through the differentiation of co-financing for those areas which are more
in need. It must be based on an integrated approach, encompassing within
the same legal and policy framework: agricultural adjustment and development,
economic diversification - notably small and medium scale industries and
rural services - the management of natural resources, the enhancement of
environmental functions, and the promotion of culture, tourism and recreation.
Point 3 - Diversification
Support for diversification of economic and social activity must focus
on providing the framework for self-sustaining private and community-based
initiatives: investment, technical assistance, business services, adequate
infrastructure, education, training, integrating advances in information
technology, strengthening the role of small towns as integral parts of
rural areas and key development factors, and promoting the development
of viable rural communities and renewal of villages.
Point 4 - Sustainability
Policies should promote rural development which sustains the quality
and amenity of Europe's rural landscapes (natural resources, biodiversity
and cultural identity), so that their use by today's generation does not
prejudice the options for future generations. In our local actions, we
must be aware of our global responsibilities.
Point 5 - Subsidiarity
Given the diversity of the Union's rural areas, rural development policy
must follow the principle of subsidiarity. It must be as decentralised
as possible and based on partnership and co-operation between all levels
concerned (local, regional, national and European). The emphasis must
be on participation and a 'bottom up' approach, which harnesses the
creativity and solidarity of rural communities. Rural development must
be local and community-driven within a coherent European framework.
Point 6 - Simplification
Rural development policy, notably in its agricultural component, needs
to undergo radical simplification in legislation. Whilst there should be
no renationalisation of the CAP, there must be greater coherence of what
is presently done through many separate channels, a limitation of EU law
on general rules and procedures, more subsidiarity in decisions, decentralisation
of policy implementation and more flexibility overall.
Point 7 - Programming
The application of rural development programmes must be based on coherent
and transparent procedures, and integrated into one single programme for
rural development for each region, and a single mechanism for sustainable
and rural development.
Point 8 . Finance
The use of local financial resources must be encouraged to promote local
rural development projects. More encouragement must be given to using financial
engineering in rural credit techniques in order to mobilise better the
synergies between public and private funding, reduce financial constraints
on small and medium size enterprises, promote productive investment, and
diversify rural economies. Greater participation by the banking sector
(public and private) and other fiscal intermediaries must be encouraged.
Point 9 - Management
The administrative capacity and effectiveness of regional and local
governments and community-based groups must be enhanced, where necessary,
through the provision of technical assistance, training, better communications,
partnership and the sharing of research, information and exchange of experience
through networking between regions and between rural communities throughout
Europe.
Point 10 - Evaluation and Research
Monitoring, evaluation and beneficiary assessment will need to be reinforced
in order to ensure transparency of procedures, guarantee the good use of
public money, stimulate research and innovation, and enable an informed
public debate. Stakeholders must not only be consulted in the design and
implementation, but involved in monitoring and evaluation.
Conclusion
We, the participants at the European Conference on Rural Development
assembled in Cork urge Europe's policy-makers:
9th November 1996