| Author |
Paper title |
| Abels, G. |
Forms and functions of participatory technology assessment – or: why should we be more sceptical about public participation? |
| Agüera-Cabo, M.A. |
Learning from women’s grassroots activism: gender reflections on environmental policy science and participatory processes |
| Aledo Tur, A., Andreu, H.G. and Noguera, G.O. |
Epistemological and ethical dilemmas of public participation |
| Andersen, I.E., Rauws, G. and Steyaert, S. |
Public deliberation at European level: the European citizens deliberation on the brain |
| Bernier, R. and the PEPPPI Steering Committee. |
The vaccine policy analysis CollaborativE (VPACE): A new model for citizen and stakeholder engagement in science policy making |
| Bonnes, M., Carrus, G., Bonaiuto, M. and Passafaro, P. |
Social psychological process and inclusive policymaking in the environmental domain: the role of local identity upon the acceptance of biodiversity and water resource conservation policies |
| Bos, L., Huitema, D. and Kerkhof, M.v.d. |
Public participation on its own barricades: citizens’ jury on water management from experiment to instrument? |
| Brodersen, S., Jørgensen, M.S. and Hansen, A. |
Environmental empowerment through co-operation between civil society, universities and science shops |
| Bulling, D. and DeKraai, M. |
A mixed methods approach to evaluation of large scale participatory processes |
| Burchell, K. |
The response of scientists to deliberative public engagement: a UK perspective |
| Cantos, J.A. and Daproza, M.G. |
Remote sensing technology and peasant knowledge: A participatory spatial approach to conservation planning in Puerto Galera, Philippines |
| Carter, C., Soma, K., Kvakkestad, V. and Vatn, A. |
The role of scale and representation in public participation: insights from recent participatory processes on genetically modified organisms
|
| Collins, K. and Ison, R. |
Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Participation and social learning as a new policy paradigm |
| Colvin, J., Bailey, P. and Orr, P. |
Reflections on building active involvement into the role of competent authority for the Water Framework Directive – the experience of the Environment Agency. |
| Cook, D. and Proctor, W. |
Assessing the threat of exotic plant pests |
| Cuppen, E., Hisschemöller, M., Dunn, B., Midden, C., and van de Kerkhof, M |
Evaluating The Quality Of Methods To Facilitate Participatory Assessments |
| de Cózar-Escalante, J.M. |
Representation as a matter of agency: a reflection on nanotechnological innovations |
| Decker, M.K. |
Means to an end. Participatory methods in technology assessment |
| Dryzek,John |
Deliberative innovation to different effect: Cross-national comparisons |
| Ekeli, K.S. |
Protecting future generations through submajority rule. |
| Fritsch, O. and Newig, J. |
Improving environmental quality through participation? A critical perspective on the effectiveness of public participation |
| Garmendia, E. and Stagl, S. |
Social learning in public participation for sustainability: Measuring the quality of participatory approaches |
| Garritt, J. |
“Now who decided that?”: Experts and the public in biodiversity conservation |
| Hall, C. |
Identifying farmer attitudes towards genetically modified crops in Scotland |
| Hamlett, P.W. |
Public deliberation in science and technology policymaking |
| Harvey , M. |
On being technically, ethically and politically reasonable: scientists, citizens and GM crops |
| Heinrichs, H. and Grunenberg, H. |
Public participation or public management? |
| Höppner, C., Frick, J. and Buchecker, M. |
Development and functions of different forms of trust in Swiss participatory landscape planning |
| Kaiser, M., Almaas, V. and Ellefsen, T. |
Consulting Europeans: experiences from the project reprogenetics |
| Kastens, B. and Newig, J. |
Participation as a key factor for the successful implementation of the WFD |
| Katz, E., Lovel, R., Mee, W. and Solomon, F. |
Social perspectives on nanotechnology research and development: a view from Australia |
| Kerkhof, M.v.d., Cuppen, E. and Hisschemoller, M. |
Repertory grid: A tool to elicit the true range of relevant concepts in a certain topic area |
| Keune, H., Koppen, G., Casteleyn, L. and Goorden, L. |
Deciding on complex knowledge; biomonitoring data and policy interpretation in Belgium |
| Kluver, Lars |
New trends in public participation |
| Koetz, T., van den Hove , S., Rauschmayer, F. and Young, J. |
Aspects of multi-level governance relevant for the design of participatory science-based consultations in EU biodiversity governance |
| Kupper, J.F.H. and Buning T.D.C. |
An interactive research method for the exploration of value frameworks in the moral deliberation on animal biotechnology |
| Leistra, G.R. |
Wintering geese in the Netherlands … Legitimate Policy?! |
| Levidow, L. |
Public participation as risk governance: enhancing democratic accountability? |
| Lukensmeyer, C |
Scale and impact citizen voices in participatory decision-making |
| Maguire, L.A. |
Complex science and participatory decision processes: Two water quality case studies from North Carolina, USA |
| Marris, C., Joly, P. and Bertrand, A. |
Choosing participants for a Constructive Technology Assessment exercise: dilemmas and consequences. |
| Moll, P. |
Third task science |
| Moore, G., Croxford, B., Adams, M., Refaee, M., Cox, T. and Sharples, S. |
Incorporating local knowledge into urban environmental research: the photo-survey method |
| Mouratiadou, I. and Moran, D. |
Mapping public participation in the Water Framework Directive: a case study of the Pinios river basin, Greece |
| Muro, M. and Jeffrey, P. |
Social learning – a useful concept for participatory decision-making processes? |
| Omann, I. , Bohunovsky, L., Kowalski, K., Madlener, R. and Stagl, S. |
A critical analysis of the influence of weights on the multi-criteria appraisal of energy scenarios |
| Pound, D. |
From conflict to co-operation – to the ecosystems approach – a case study in stakeholder participation for a European marine site in Kent |
| Raman, S. |
Three burdens of public participation in science and technology |
| Rasche, K. and Hare, M. |
Measuring the intensity of participation along six dimensions |
| Rauschmayer, F. and Görg, C. |
Participation in cross-scale interactions – a difficult issue exemplified by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment |
| Renn, O |
Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance |
| Reynolds, L. and Szerszynski, B. |
Representing GM nation |
| Richards, C. and Blackstock, K. |
Participation and regulation: where two worlds collide? |
| Rodriguez-Labajos, B. |
A multi-scale scenario approach to biological invasions. Two cases in the Ebro river |
| Roelofsen, A., Broerse, J.E.W. and Bunders, J.F.G. |
Exploring the future of genomics |
| Sanders, A., Hyam, P., Acland, A. and Alder, S. |
Engaging community groups in discussions on science issues: the CoRWM discussion guide. |
| Singh, J. |
What difference does being represented make? |
| Tàbara, J.D., Roca , E., Madrid , C. and Cazorla, X. |
Developing Integrated Sustainability Assessment tools and methods for water management. The case of the EU Matisse project in the Ebro river basin |
| Tomkins, A.J., Christensen, I. , Loontjer, K., Fulwider, J., Abdel-Monem, T. and Cohn, D. |
Labeling genetically modified foods: a community discussion |
| Truffer, B., Voss J.P. and Konrad, K. |
Sustainability Foresight as a means for participatory transformation management |
| van Merkerk, R.O. and Smits, R.E.H.M. |
Tailoring constructive technology assessment for emerging technologies |
| Wilson, D. and T.J. Hegland |
Some institutional Aspects of Science in Support of the Common Fisheries Policy |
Socio-Economic Research
EC FPVI Science and Society SAS6-CT-2004-510636